Table of Contents
Raw Food Diet for Dogs
Raw food diet for dogs has gained popularity with 15-20% of dog owners in USA, UK, and Australia feeding raw meat-based diets or BARF (Biologically Appropriate Raw Food) diets to their dogs despite major veterinary organizations including American Veterinary Medical Association and American Animal Hospital Association recommending against raw feeding due to bacterial contamination risks and nutritional imbalance concerns. Raw diet dogs show 54% prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli in feces compared to 17% in dogs fed commercial diets, with Salmonella detected in 4% of raw fed dogs versus 0% in commercially-fed dogs representing significant public health risks particularly for households with young children, elderly individuals, or immunocompromised family members. This comprehensive guide examines raw food diet for dogs scientific evidence, bacterial contamination risks in raw diet for dogs, nutritional adequacy analysis of BARF diet formulations, and veterinary recommendations regarding raw feeding across USA, UK, Australia, and Asian markets, providing evidence-based assessment distinguishing marketing claims from peer-reviewed research about raw diet dogs.
Raw Food Diet Claims vs Scientific Evidence
Raw diet advocates claim that raw food diet for dogs mimics ancestral wolf diets providing superior nutrition compared to processed commercial dog foods, though genetic research published in Nature demonstrates dogs diverged from wolves 15,000-40,000 years ago developing genetic adaptations allowing starch digestion absent in wolves. Dogs possess increased amylase gene copies enabling carbohydrate metabolism, altered glucose absorption pathways, and modified pancreatic function supporting omnivorous diets including grains and vegetables that wolves cannot efficiently process. Feeding raw diet dogs exclusively meat ignores thousands of years of canine evolution alongside humans creating genetic and physiological differences from ancestral wolves.
Proponents of raw diet for dogs claim improved coat quality, increased energy levels, reduced allergies, cleaner teeth, smaller firmer stools, and general health benefits compared to commercial diets, though peer-reviewed research fails to document these claimed advantages. Anecdotal reports from raw diet dog owners describe perceived improvements, but controlled scientific studies comparing raw fed dogs versus commercially fed dogs find no significant differences in health outcomes when dogs receive nutritionally complete diets regardless of processing method. Placebo effects and confirmation bias influence owner perceptions, with raw diet feeding owners primed to notice positive changes while dismissing or minimizing problems.
Raw diet dogs supposedly avoid contaminants present in commercial dog foods including melamine, aflatoxins, and other toxins that prompted historical recalls, though raw meat carries substantially higher bacterial contamination risks including Salmonella, E. coli, Campylobacter, and Listeria creating immediate health threats. The 2007 melamine contamination affecting commercial pet foods killed approximately 4,000 dogs and cats, though bacterial contamination from raw feeding causes ongoing continuous risks affecting thousands of dogs and humans annually through foodborne illness and antimicrobial-resistant bacterial transmission. Trading one risk category for another fails to provide net safety improvement for raw diet dogs or their owners.
Claims that raw diet for dogs provides dental health benefits through chewing bones and raw meat lack scientific support, with dental disease developing at similar rates in raw fed dogs compared to dogs eating commercial kibble or canned food. While mechanical chewing action provides some plaque removal, raw diet dogs frequently fracture teeth on hard bones requiring expensive dental extractions, and bone fragments create gastrointestinal obstruction risks necessitating emergency surgery. The dental benefit claims oversimplify complex periodontal disease factors including genetics, oral bacteria populations, and home dental care practices that determine actual dental health outcomes regardless of raw diet feeding.
Bacterial Contamination in Raw Diet for Dogs
Salmonella contamination affects raw meat-based dog food at rates exceeding 20-30% based on FDA surveys testing commercial raw diet products, with contaminated raw diet creating infection risks for dogs and bacterial transmission risks for humans handling raw food or contacting raw diet dogs. Salmonella causes foodborne illness in humans producing severe diarrhea, fever, abdominal cramping, and potentially life-threatening bacteremia particularly in young children, elderly adults, and immunocompromised individuals. Dogs fed raw diet may not show obvious Salmonella illness due to acidic stomach pH killing some bacteria, but shed Salmonella in feces for weeks creating environmental contamination in homes and yards.
E. coli including antimicrobial-resistant and multi-drug-resistant strains colonize raw diet dogs at dramatically higher rates compared to commercially-fed dogs, with 54% of raw diet dogs carrying antimicrobial-resistant E. coli versus only 17% of dogs fed commercial diets. Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli representing highest-priority critically important antimicrobials affects 31% of raw diet dogs compared to 4% of commercially-fed dogs, threatening human medicine’s ability to treat serious bacterial infections with first-line antibiotics. Raw diet dogs serve as reservoirs for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, shedding resistant organisms throughout homes where family members including children contact contaminated surfaces during normal daily activities.
Campylobacter bacteria contaminating raw chicken and other poultry products creates diarrheal illness risks in dogs and humans, with direct correlation documented between raw diet dogs fed raw chicken and Campylobacter shedding in feces. Studies examining pathogen transmission from raw feeding demonstrate that raw diet dogs spread bacterial contamination to food preparation surfaces, dog bowls, toys, bedding, and throughout homes where family members unknowingly contact contaminated surfaces. Standard household cleaning products may not adequately eliminate bacterial contamination from raw feeding, requiring hospital-grade disinfectants and meticulous hygiene protocols preventing bacterial transmission risks.
Listeria monocytogenes and other foodborne pathogens identified in raw meat dog foods create additional infection risks, with FDA surveys identifying multiple pathogen types in commercial raw diet products prompting frequent recalls. The cumulative bacterial contamination burden from raw diet feeding exposes dogs and humans to continuous pathogen risks unlike single contamination events affecting commercial processed foods. Every meal of raw diet for dogs introduces new bacterial contamination requiring constant vigilance preventing illness in dogs and zoonotic transmission to humans sharing living spaces with raw diet dogs.
Nutritional Imbalances in Homemade Raw Diet for Dogs
Nutritional analysis of homemade raw diet recipes reveals that 60% contain major nutritional imbalances including calcium deficiency or excess, vitamin D deficiency, essential fatty acid imbalances, and inadequate or excessive mineral content creating developmental abnormalities in puppies and metabolic disturbances in adult dogs. Calcium represents the most common nutritional imbalance in raw diet for dogs, with meat containing minimal calcium requiring bone supplementation achieving appropriate calcium-phosphorus ratios. Ten percent of raw diet dogs consume less than 25% of recommended calcium while 10% receive more than 300 times the recommended allowance, demonstrating extreme variability in homemade raw diet formulations.
Puppies fed calcium-deficient raw diet develop nutritional secondary hyperparathyroidism causing skeletal deformities, pathologic fractures, and permanent developmental orthopedic disease. Large and giant breed puppies particularly vulnerable to nutritional imbalances during rapid growth phases experience irreversible bone damage from improper calcium-phosphorus ratios in raw diet formulations. Excess calcium from overfeeding bones creates different problems including developmental orthopedic disease, constipation, and mineral imbalances interfering with absorption of other essential nutrients in raw diet dogs.
Vitamin deficiencies including vitamin D, vitamin E, and vitamin B complex commonly affect raw diet dogs eating homemade formulations without appropriate supplementation. Vitamin D deficiency causes rickets in growing puppies fed raw diet and contributes to calcium metabolism disorders affecting bone health throughout life. Vitamin E deficiency from feeding polyunsaturated fatty acid-rich meats without supplementation creates oxidative damage and potential pansteatitis, a painful inflammatory condition affecting adipose tissue. Commercial raw diet products may include vitamin supplementation, though homemade raw diet formulations typically lack adequate vitamin fortification.
Essential fatty acid imbalances affect raw diet dogs fed predominantly red meat containing higher omega-6 relative to omega-3 fatty acids, creating pro-inflammatory conditions contributing to allergies, skin disease, and chronic inflammation. Achieving optimal omega-6 to omega-3 ratios requires careful meat source selection and potentially fish oil supplementation, though most raw diet dog owners lack nutritional expertise calculating appropriate fatty acid profiles. The complexity of formulating nutritionally complete raw diet for dogs exceeds most owners’ capabilities, making nutritional imbalances virtually inevitable without professional veterinary nutritionist consultation.
BARF Diet Model Analysis and Limitations
BARF diet guidelines recommend 70% muscle meat, 10% raw edible bone, 7% vegetables, 5% liver, 5% other organs, 2% seeds/nuts, and 1% fruit as feeding framework for raw diet dogs, though these ratios lack scientific validation through feeding trials documenting nutritional adequacy. The BARF model originated from anecdotal observations and theoretical extrapolations from ancestral diets rather than controlled research establishing optimal nutrient profiles for raw diet dogs. Individual dogs’ nutritional requirements vary based on age, activity level, reproductive status, and health conditions, making single universal raw diet formula inappropriate for all dogs.
Vegetable inclusion in BARF diet for dogs contradicts raw diet advocates’ arguments about carnivorous canine evolution, as wolves consume minimal plant material beyond incidental ingestion of stomach contents from prey animals. If raw diet philosophy emphasizes ancestral appropriateness, the 7% vegetable component represents inconsistent compromise acknowledging dogs require nutrients vegetables provide but evolutionary arguments don’t support. The vegetable ratios in BARF diet likely reflect attempts addressing nutritional gaps in meat-only formulations, though vegetable digestibility in dogs remains limited without extensive processing breaking down cellulose cell walls.
Raw bone feeding in BARF diet for dogs creates mechanical injury risks including fractured teeth requiring extraction, esophageal or gastrointestinal obstruction necessitating emergency surgery, and intestinal perforation causing peritonitis and potential death. Veterinary emergency hospitals regularly treat raw diet dogs requiring foreign body surgery removing impacted bones or repairing intestinal perforations from bone fragments. The 10% raw bone component intended providing calcium creates considerable medical risks, with safer alternatives including ground bone meal or calcium supplements eliminating choking and obstruction hazards while delivering equivalent nutritional calcium.
Organ meat requirements in BARF diet including 5% liver and 5% other secreting organs provide essential vitamins particularly vitamin A, though liver feeding creates vitamin A toxicity risks when dogs consume excessive amounts. The 5% liver recommendation supplies more than vitamin A requirements, with dogs sensitive to organ meats experiencing digestive upset from high organ content. Source, quality, and safety of organs used in raw diet for dogs raises concerns, as organ meats concentrate toxins, parasites, and pathogens potentially present in source animals creating additional health risks beyond muscle meat contamination.
Commercial Raw Diet Products vs Homemade Formulations
Commercial raw diet products undergo minimal processing maintaining raw state while theoretically providing complete balanced nutrition through professionally formulated recipes, though FDA testing identifies bacterial contamination including Salmonella and Listeria in commercial raw diet exceeding contamination rates in conventional processed pet foods. Raw diet companies employ freeze-drying, high-pressure processing, or freezing to reduce but not eliminate bacterial contamination, with these preservation methods less effective than cooking used in traditional kibble and canned food manufacturing. Even premium commercial raw diet products test positive for pathogenic bacteria creating ongoing contamination risks.
Nutritional adequacy of commercial raw diet varies between manufacturers, with some products meeting Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) standards through feeding trials while others rely on calculated nutritional analysis without actual feeding trial validation. Raw diet formulations passing feeding trials demonstrate dogs can survive eating the diet for minimum test period, though don’t necessarily prove optimal long-term health compared to conventional diets. Many commercial raw diet products lack feeding trial validation, relying instead on formulation calculations that may not account for nutrient bioavailability differences between raw and processed ingredients.
Cost represents significant practical limitation of commercial raw diet for dogs, with prices ranging $5-12 per pound versus $1-3 per pound for premium conventional kibble, creating annual feeding costs of $2,000-6,000 for average 50-pound dogs fed commercial raw diet compared to $600-1,200 for equivalent-quality conventional food. The substantial cost premium for raw diet reflects refrigeration/freezing requirements, shorter shelf life, more expensive ingredients, and smaller production scales compared to conventional pet food manufacturing. Many families cannot sustain commercial raw diet costs long-term, leading to inconsistent feeding or switching to cheaper homemade raw diet formulations with higher nutritional imbalance risks.
Storage and handling requirements for commercial raw diet complicate feeding logistics, requiring freezer space for bulk storage, refrigerator thawing for daily portions, separate preparation areas preventing cross-contamination with human food, and meticulous cleaning protocols eliminating bacterial contamination. Families with limited freezer capacity, busy schedules preventing elaborate meal preparation, or young children creating cross-contamination risks face practical barriers making raw diet feeding impractical regardless of theoretical nutritional preferences. The convenience and safety advantages of shelf-stable kibble outweigh potential raw diet benefits for most dog-owning households.
Veterinary Professional Organizations’ Positions on Raw Diet
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) officially discourages raw diet feeding due to bacterial contamination risks and potential nutritional inadequacies, with policy statements recommending against raw meat-based diets unless ingredients undergo pathogen reduction treatment. AVMA policy reflects consensus among veterinary professionals that raw diet risks outweigh unproven benefits, particularly given availability of numerous commercially-prepared conventional diets meeting dogs’ nutritional needs without bacterial contamination concerns. The AVMA position acknowledges owner autonomy in feeding decisions while clearly communicating professional concerns about raw diet safety.
American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) similarly recommends against feeding raw meat-based diets, incorporating raw diet concerns into practice accreditation standards requiring veterinary hospitals to educate clients about raw feeding risks. AAHA recognizes that some owners remain committed to raw feeding despite veterinary recommendations, encouraging veterinarians to maintain client relationships while documenting discussions about raw diet risks protecting both animal welfare and professional liability. The organization emphasizes that veterinarians should not recommend raw feeding given current evidence documenting more risks than benefits.
FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine issued public warnings about raw pet food safety following surveys documenting high bacterial contamination rates in commercial raw diet products. Federal regulatory agencies rarely issue consumer warnings about specific product categories, with the FDA action reflecting serious public health concerns about antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in raw pet foods creating human health threats. The FDA continues monitoring raw pet food contamination through ongoing sampling programs identifying products requiring recalls, though enforcement challenges exist given the pet food regulatory framework.
European veterinary organizations in UK, Australia, and other countries similarly discourage raw feeding, with British Veterinary Association and Australian Veterinary Association publishing position statements highlighting bacterial contamination risks and nutritional inadequacy concerns mirroring North American veterinary organizations’ perspectives. Global veterinary consensus opposing raw diet feeding reflects consistent scientific evidence documenting risks across different geographic regions and dog populations. Individual veterinarians supporting raw feeding represent minority opinions contradicting mainstream veterinary medicine’s evidence-based assessments.
Public Health Implications of Raw Diet Dogs
Zoonotic disease transmission from raw diet dogs to human family members represents the most serious public health concern about raw feeding, with children, elderly individuals, and immunocompromised people facing highest infection risks from contact with raw diet dogs shedding pathogenic bacteria. Young children’s natural tendency to touch dogs, floors, and toys then placing hands in mouths creates efficient bacterial transmission pathways, with pediatric Salmonellosis and E. coli infections traced to household dogs fed raw diet. Families with vulnerable members should completely avoid raw diet feeding given the unacceptable infection risks to household occupants.
Antimicrobial resistance propagation through raw diet dogs spreading resistant bacteria throughout communities represents global public health threat potentially compromising human antibiotic effectiveness. When raw diet dogs colonized with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli contact other dogs at parks, grooming facilities, or veterinary clinics, they can transmit resistant bacteria to other dogs who then spread resistance to additional households. The cumulative effect of thousands of raw diet dogs shedding antimicrobial-resistant organisms contributes to the growing crisis of antibiotic-resistant infections threatening human medicine’s ability to treat common bacterial diseases.
Environmental contamination from raw diet dogs defecating in public areas, dog parks, and neighborhoods spreads pathogenic bacteria beyond individual households, creating community-level public health concerns. Salmonella and resistant E. coli shed in raw diet dog feces persist in soil and water for weeks to months, potentially infecting other animals and humans contacting contaminated environments. Communities cannot regulate or prevent this environmental contamination from raw diet feeding, making individual household feeding decisions matter for community-wide health outcomes.
Healthcare system costs treating foodborne illnesses and antimicrobial-resistant infections linked to raw diet dogs remain unquantified though likely substantial, with pediatric hospitalizations for Salmonellosis and severe E. coli infections costing thousands to tens of thousands of dollars per case. The cumulative societal costs of raw diet feeding extend beyond individual dog owners accepting personal risks, affecting healthcare systems, public health agencies, and communities bearing costs of infections and antimicrobial resistance propagated through raw diet dogs. These externalized costs rarely factor into raw diet feeding decisions though represent legitimate public health concerns justifying veterinary recommendations against raw feeding.
Alternative Feeding Approaches Balancing Naturalness and Safety
Home-cooked diets for dogs using cooked meats, grains, and vegetables eliminate bacterial contamination risks while allowing ingredient quality control and customization, though require professional veterinary nutritionist consultation ensuring nutritional adequacy. Board-certified veterinary nutritionists formulate customized cooked diet recipes calculating precise nutrient profiles meeting individual dogs’ requirements based on age, weight, activity level, and health conditions. Services including BalanceIT and commercial home-cooked diet recipe services provide nutritionally complete formulations preventing the nutritional imbalances common in unformulated homemade diets whether raw or cooked.
Gently cooked commercial diets including brands like JustFoodForDogs, The Farmer’s Dog, and Nom Nom provide fresh whole-food ingredients with minimal processing while maintaining pathogen safety through light cooking killing bacteria without extensive nutrient degradation. These fresh commercial diets bridge the gap between raw diet appeals to naturalness and conventional kibble’s convenience and safety, offering refrigerated fresh food with balanced nutrition and microbial safety. Costs remain higher than conventional kibble though typically lower than commercial raw diet, making gently-cooked diets more economically sustainable for many families seeking fresh feeding options.
High-quality conventional kibble and canned foods manufactured by companies employing board-certified veterinary nutritionists and conducting feeding trials provide nutritionally complete safe convenient feeding requiring no preparation or special storage. Premium conventional diets use quality ingredients, appropriate processing maintaining nutrient bioavailability, and rigorous quality control preventing contamination. The decades of research supporting conventional pet food formulation and manufacturing creates evidence base for nutritional adequacy that raw diet proponents cannot match despite marketing claims about superiority.
Combination feeding approaches using primarily conventional diets supplemented with small amounts of cooked or raw foods as treats or toppers may satisfy owners’ desires providing fresh foods while maintaining core nutrition from balanced commercial diets. This compromise approach limits bacterial contamination exposure compared to full raw diet feeding while allowing some ingredient variety and fresh food supplementation. However, veterinarians caution that excessive treat and topper feeding can create nutritional imbalances even when base diet is complete, recommending treats and supplements comprise less than 10% of total daily calories.
International Perspectives on Raw Diet for Dogs
USA raw diet feeding rates reach 15-20% of dog owners in some surveys, with higher prevalence in urban areas, among higher-income households, and in communities with active pet wellness culture promoting alternative feeding approaches. Raw diet commercial products widely available through specialty pet stores, online retailers, and some veterinary clinics despite veterinary organizations’ opposition creates mixed messaging confusing owners receiving conflicting information. Regional variation exists with raw diet feeding more common in California, Pacific Northwest, and Northeast compared to Midwest and Southern states, though raw feeding advocacy groups operate nationally.
UK raw diet feeding similarly affects 10-15% of dog owners, with British Veterinary Association actively discouraging raw feeding through public education campaigns and veterinary practice guidelines. Research conducted in UK documenting high antimicrobial-resistant bacterial prevalence in raw diet dogs prompted significant media coverage raising public awareness about raw feeding risks. However, commercial raw diet products remain legally available with less restrictive regulation than conventional pet foods creating paradoxical situation where veterinary profession opposes practice that commerce sector actively promotes.
Australia raw diet prevalence reaches 10-12% of dog owners based on surveys, with Australian Veterinary Association publishing position statements opposing raw feeding. The country’s geographic isolation and biosecurity concerns about imported pathogens influence regulatory approaches to raw pet food, though domestic raw diet manufacturing and feeding remains legal. Urban versus rural differences exist, with raw feeding more common in cities where pet wellness culture thrives compared to rural areas where working dogs typically receive conventional commercial diets.
Asian markets show variable raw diet adoption, with Japan, South Korea, and Singapore demonstrating increasing raw feeding interest particularly among younger pet owners influenced by Western pet care trends. Traditional Asian pet feeding practices historically emphasized cooked foods making raw feeding represent newer Western-influenced approach rather than cultural norm. India, China, and Southeast Asian countries show lower raw diet prevalence, with cost barriers, food safety cultural attitudes, and different veterinary practice patterns influencing feeding approaches. Urban-rural divides appear pronounced, with raw feeding concentrated in metropolitan areas among higher-income pet owners.
Common Questions About Raw Diet for Dogs
Is raw food diet healthier for dogs than kibble?
No peer-reviewed scientific evidence demonstrates raw diet provides health benefits exceeding quality commercial kibble, while substantial research documents raw diet risks including bacterial contamination and nutritional imbalances. Claims about improved coat, energy, and health lack controlled scientific validation. Major veterinary organizations including AVMA recommend against raw feeding given current evidence.
Can dogs get sick from eating raw meat?
Dogs can develop Salmonella, E. coli, Campylobacter, and other foodborne infections from contaminated raw meat, though acidic stomach pH provides some protection. More concerningly, raw diet dogs become asymptomatic carriers shedding pathogenic bacteria in feces creating human infection risks, particularly for children, elderly, and immunocompromised household members.
Does raw diet clean dogs’ teeth better than kibble?
No scientific evidence supports superior dental benefits from raw feeding compared to conventional diets. Raw diet dogs develop dental disease at similar rates as kibble-fed dogs. Raw bone chewing creates tooth fracture risks requiring expensive extractions and bone fragments cause gastrointestinal obstruction requiring emergency surgery.
Are wolves’ diets appropriate for modern dogs?
No, dogs diverged genetically from wolves 15,000-40,000 years ago developing digestive adaptations for starch metabolism that wolves lack. Dogs evolved alongside humans eating omnivorous diets including grains and vegetables, making them genetically distinct from wolves with different nutritional requirements and digestive capabilities.
How do I make nutritionally complete homemade raw diet?
Formulating nutritionally adequate raw diet requires board-certified veterinary nutritionist consultation calculating precise nutrient profiles for individual dogs. Sixty percent of homemade raw diet recipes contain major nutritional imbalances creating health risks. Services like BalanceIT provide professionally formulated recipes, though cooking ingredients eliminates bacterial risks while maintaining nutritional benefits.
What do veterinarians recommend instead of raw diet?
Veterinarians recommend quality commercial diets manufactured by companies employing veterinary nutritionists and conducting feeding trials, gently-cooked commercial fresh diets, or home-cooked diets formulated by veterinary nutritionists. These alternatives provide nutritional adequacy and microbial safety without raw feeding risks.
Does raw diet cause antimicrobial resistance?
Raw diet dogs show 54% prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli versus 17% in conventionally-fed dogs, with 31% carrying third-generation cephalosporin-resistant bacteria versus 4% in non-raw-fed dogs. Raw diet dogs serve as reservoirs spreading resistant bacteria throughout households and communities representing significant public health concern.
Can I feed raw diet if I’m careful with handling?
Even meticulous handling cannot eliminate bacterial shedding from raw diet dogs, as bacteria are shed in feces for weeks creating continuous household contamination. Families with young children, elderly, or immunocompromised members should completely avoid raw feeding regardless of handling precautions given unacceptable human health risks.
Evidence-Based Feeding Decisions for Dog Owners
Scientific evidence examining raw diet for dogs demonstrates substantial documented risks including bacterial contamination affecting both dogs and humans, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria transmission creating public health threats, nutritional imbalances causing developmental and metabolic diseases, and mechanical injury risks from bone feeding requiring emergency veterinary intervention. These documented risks contrast with theoretical benefits claimed by raw diet advocates but unsupported by peer-reviewed controlled research comparing raw diet dogs to conventionally-fed dogs receiving quality commercial diets. The consensus opposition to raw feeding from major veterinary organizations including AVMA, AAHA, FDA, and international veterinary associations reflects overwhelming scientific evidence that raw diet risks outweigh unproven benefits. Dog owners seeking fresh natural feeding approaches can choose safer alternatives including gently-cooked commercial diets, home-cooked diets formulated by veterinary nutritionists, or premium conventional diets manufactured using rigorous quality control and nutritional science without exposing dogs and families to preventable bacterial contamination and nutritional inadequacy risks inherent in raw feeding practices regardless of ingredient quality or careful handling protocols.
Discover. Learn. Travel Better.
Explore trusted insights and travel smart with expert guides and curated recommendations for your next journey.