Table of Contents
Diet-associated heart changes in dogs
Short answer: Evidence to date points to notable differences among pulses, with peas showing the strongest association signals in diet patterns linked to canine dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), while lentils appear less strongly implicated; however, a single causative ingredient has not been proven, and overall formulation, inclusion level, fiber profile, and processing likely modulate risk.
What regulators and researchers have observed
- FDA alerts and case reports associated many DCM cases with “grain-free” diets that contain high proportions of pulses (peas, lentils, other legumes) and/or potatoes, though no single causal factor has been confirmed.
- In FDA-referenced analyses comparing diets reported in DCM cases vs. other diets, peas—and to a lesser extent lentils—were the ingredients that most distinguished the DCM-associated diets, suggesting pulse-type differences within reported diet patterns.
Head-to-head data: peas versus lentils
- A controlled 28‑day crossover study in Beagles comparing a wrinkled pea diet, a lentil diet, and grain controls found subclinical, DCM‑like cardiac changes only with the pea diet: reduced stroke volume and cardiac output, increased end‑systolic diameter, and elevated NT‑proBNP, while the lentil diet did not produce these cardiac changes under the same conditions.
- The same study reported reduced digestibility of some macronutrients and sulfur amino acids on pulse-based diets compared with grain-based, likely due to higher fiber; taurine levels remained normal, indicating mechanisms beyond taurine alone.
“Foodomics” signals implicate peas more than lentils
- Metabolomic profiling of diets linked to reported DCM cases versus control diets found 122 compounds higher and 27 lower in the DCM-associated group; peas were identified as the ingredient contributing most to the differentiating compounds, with lentils contributing to a lesser degree.
- The authors emphasized this does not prove causality but supports peas as a leading possible ingredient associated with the biochemical profile of DCM‑reported diets.
Role of inclusion level, fiber, and oligosaccharides
- A 5‑week Beagle trial comparing a grain‑based control, a grain‑free pea-based diet (~30% peas), an added‑oligosaccharide diet, and a high‑insoluble‑fiber “husbandry/dental” diet found NT‑proBNP rose with the pea-based and oligosaccharide diets versus grain-based, and rose even more with the high‑insoluble‑fiber diet that contained no legumes, suggesting that fiber type/amount and oligosaccharides can also influence cardiac biomarkers.
- These findings, alongside the 28‑day pea trial that used very high pea inclusion, indicate both dose (inclusion level) and the broader formulation matrix (fiber type, processing) matter in how diets affect early cardiac signals.
What about other pulses beyond peas and lentils?
- FDA advisories grouped non‑soy pulses together (peas, lentils, chickpeas, etc.), reflecting their prominence in grain‑free formulations reported in DCM cases, but did not pinpoint a single pulse as causal.
- Published comparative data isolating chickpeas or other pulses are limited relative to peas and lentils; current differentiating evidence most consistently highlights peas, with lentils showing weaker associations in foodomics and not reproducing pea‑like cardiac changes in the short crossover trial cited above.
How to translate this into safer choices
- Prefer diets from manufacturers with strong nutrition expertise that avoid heavy reliance on a single pulse, especially peas, high on the ingredient list, and that demonstrate complete-and-balanced formulations via robust validation; FDA continues to advise caution while research proceeds.
- If choosing grain-free, consider formulas with lower pulse inclusion and balanced fiber profiles; monitor health and discuss cardiac biomarker screening (e.g., NT‑proBNP) with a veterinarian when risk factors exist or when feeding pulse-forward diets long term.
- Remember that association is not causation: differences among pulses exist in current evidence, but overall formulation quality, inclusion levels, and processing likely drive much of the observed risk variation.
- Among pulses, peas currently have the strongest association with diet patterns reported in canine DCM and have produced subclinical cardiac changes in controlled feeding studies, whereas lentils appear less strongly associated and did not produce the same echocardiographic changes under matched conditions in one short-term trial.
- These findings point to meaningful pulse-type differences, but they are not definitive; diet formulation, fiber/oligosaccharides, and inclusion levels are key determinants, and ongoing research is needed to clarify causation.